Palestinabuch

What it is

The Palestinabuch is a legendary text attributed to Herman Wirth, a German-Dutch historian and founder of the Ahnenerbe. It is described as a major work that supposedly changed historical understanding if it had survived. The manuscript is alleged to contain evidence that Ashkenazi Jews are descendants of Khazars or Central Asian peoples, rather than ancient Israelites. This idea supports antisemitic narratives about Aryan superiority and Jewish illegitimacy. The book is considered a counterpart to Wirth's Ura Linda Chronicle, which promotes Nordic racial myths. Its existence is debated, with many believing it was never completed or was destroyed due to its controversial content.

Where it comes from

Herman Wirth first mentioned the Palestinabuch in his 1933 commentary on the Ura Linda Chronicle. The Chronicle is a 19th-century forgery claiming to document a lost Polar civilization. He proposed that Christ came from a lost Aryan tribe whose influence appeared in Near Eastern megaliths. He argued that Christianity was corrupted by Judaism and needed purification. The Palestinabuch was intended to provide historical proof for these views. Its title evolved over time, reflecting shifts in Wirth's focus on megalithic religions and Oriental-Occidental connections.

How it is done

No methods of creation or use are recorded because the manuscript is lost. Accounts suggest it contained symbolic historical analysis and archaeological interpretations. Wirth claimed it would deconstruct the Old Testament using Hyperborean gnosis. The text allegedly revealed the original meaning of biblical traditions, free from what he saw as biased interpretations. Some accounts claim it included excavations data from Palestine. However, no actual content exists for study. The book remains a myth within esoteric circles, cited only through second-hand reports.

What it is for

The Palestinabuch was designed to support antisemitic ideologies. It aimed to prove that Jews were not the chosen people of ancient Israel but later immigrants from Central Asia. This narrative sought to delegitimize Jewish claims to religious and historical heritage. For adherents of Ariosophy, the book provided a foundation for rejecting Judeo-Christian values. It was also used to promote Frisian and Nordic racial purity. The text served as a tool for political theorists like Miguel Serrano and Aleksandr Dugin to justify their own extremist views.

Who does it

Herman Wirth is the sole author associated with the Palestinabuch. He was a historian and a key figure in Pre-War Ariosophy. His biographers do not mention the book, suggesting it may have been hidden or ignored. Wilhelm Landig, a publisher, left some of Wirth's manuscripts unprinted. Later figures like Miguel Serrano and Aleksandr Dugin promoted the myth of the lost book. They claimed access to secret archives or interviews with Wirth. These individuals used the Palestinabuch to advance their own geopolitical and racial theories.

Peoples and places

The Palestinabuch is primarily associated with German and Dutch esoteric circles. It gained traction among Russian nationalists through Aleksandr Dugin. Chilean diplomat Miguel Serrano also spread the story. In the United States, right-wing radicals have adopted the myth. The text is linked to Frisian cultural pride and Nordic racial theories. It is cited by those who believe in Khazar origin theories for Ashkenazi Jews. The narrative has crossed borders, appearing in various nationalist movements across Europe and the Americas.

What people believe

The Palestinabuch is rooted in Ariosophic beliefs about Aryan supremacy. It posits that a lost Hyperborean civilization influenced all ancient cultures. Wirth believed that Judaism distorted pure Aryan spirituality. The manuscript allegedly proved that Jesus was Aryan and that Christianity was originally a fertility cult. Adherents view the book as a suppressed truth about human history. They believe it reveals the true origins of religious texts and racial groups. The loss of the book is seen as part of a conspiracy to hide this knowledge.

How scholars and sceptics see it

Academic historians generally regard the Palestinabuch as a myth or forgery. Wirth's other works, like the Ura Linda Chronicle, are known forgeries. Scholars note that Wirth's theories lack empirical evidence. The claim that Jews are Khazar descendants is widely rejected by geneticists and historians. The Palestinabuch is studied as an example of Nazi-era pseudohistory. Researchers analyze how such myths persist in modern extremist circles. The book serves as a case study in the manipulation of historical narratives for political ends.

Compare and confuse

The Palestinabuch is similar to other lost manuscript myths in esoteric circles. It shares themes with the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, another antisemitic forgery. Both texts claim to reveal hidden truths about Jewish power or origins. The Khazar theory is also found in other pseudo-historical works. Unlike genuine historical texts, the Palestinabuch offers no verifiable content. It relies on conspiracy theories to maintain its appeal. Its narrative structure mirrors other Aryan-centric myths promoted by Wirth.

Questions people ask about Palestinabuch

Good reading and sources

• Palestinabuch on WikipediaEncyclopedia
• Wikidata recordOpen data