Enfield poltergeist
A disputed 1970s case of alleged supernatural activity in a London home
The Enfield poltergeist was a claim of haunting at a council house in London between 1977 and 1979. The events centered on two sisters who were said to produce voices and move objects, sparking intense debate between believers and skeptics.
- Claims occurred at 284 Green Street, Enfield, between 1977 and 1979.
- Sisters Janet and Margaret Hodgson were central to the alleged events.
- Investigators recorded voices and movements that skeptics attributed to trickery.
- Stage magicians and scientists criticized the paranormal investigators' methods.
- The case inspired films, TV shows, and extensive media coverage.
What it is
The Enfield poltergeist refers to a series of claims regarding supernatural disturbances at a specific residence in London during the late 1970s. A poltergeist is typically understood as a restless spirit or entity that causes physical disruption, such as moving items or making loud noises. In this instance, the reported phenomena included furniture sliding, toys being thrown, and disembodied voices speaking through the children living in the house. The case became famous for the conflicting interpretations it generated, ranging from genuine paranormal activity to elaborate deception by the young residents.
Where it comes from
The incidents began in August 1977 when a single mother reported strange occurrences to the police. Over the next eighteen months, the situation drew significant attention from journalists, paranormal researchers, and the general public. The location was a council house in Brimsdown, Enfield. The narrative gained traction through newspaper reports and radio broadcasts, eventually becoming a cultural touchstone for discussions about hauntings and the reliability of eyewitness testimony in the United Kingdom.
How it is done
Reports described various disruptive events occurring within the home. Witnesses claimed to hear knocking sounds on walls and observe heavy furniture moving without human assistance. Children associated with the household were said to levitate or speak in deep, gruff male voices that did not match their own vocal ranges. Investigators recorded these events using audio equipment and cameras, though later analysis suggested many of these recordings could be explained by natural causes or deliberate manipulation by the subjects involved.
Tools and materials
Investigators utilized tape recorders and still cameras to document the alleged activities. These devices captured audio of voices and images of the children in various states of motion. Some observers noted the use of remote-controlled cameras to capture events without immediate human presence. However, skeptics pointed out that technical malfunctions, such as tape jams, were often misinterpreted as supernatural interference rather than equipment failure.
Enfield poltergeist, drawn and placed
- Living
- Revived
- Fading
- Historical
- Legendary
- Performed
What it is for
The primary purpose of the investigations was to determine whether the events had a paranormal origin or were fabricated. Believers sought to validate the existence of spirits and entities capable of interacting with the physical world. Conversely, skeptics aimed to expose trickery and highlight the psychological factors that lead people to perceive supernatural causes for mundane or staged events. The case served as a focal point for debates on the nature of belief and evidence.
Who does it
The case attracted various types of investigators. Paranormal researchers from organizations like the Society for Psychical Research spent time in the house attempting to communicate with the alleged entity. Stage magicians and scientific skeptics also examined the evidence, focusing on the physical capabilities of the children and the reliability of the recordings. Scholars and psychologists later analyzed the case to understand the social and psychological dynamics at play.
Peoples and places
The events took place in England, specifically in the London borough of Enfield. The case became widely known across the UK and internationally through media coverage. It influenced public perception of hauntings and paranormal research in Britain. The story has been revisited by various generations of researchers and audiences, maintaining its status as one of the most discussed modern cases of alleged poltergeist activity.
At a glance: who, where and when
Who does it
What people believe
Believers held that an entity, possibly the spirit of a deceased man, was responsible for the disturbances. They interpreted the voices and movements as evidence of a non-physical presence interacting with the living. Skeptics argued that the events were best explained by the psychological state of the children and the expectations of the adults around them. This dichotomy highlights differing views on how to interpret unexplained phenomena.
When it is done
The core period of reported activity spanned from August 1977 to approximately 1979. The case remained in the public consciousness long after the events ceased, with numerous documentaries, books, and films produced decades later. It continues to be referenced in discussions about urban legends and paranormal folklore.
How scholars and sceptics see it
Skeptics and scientists have heavily criticized the original investigations. Magicians and researchers pointed out inconsistencies in the recordings and photographs, suggesting that the children were staging events. Psychologists have analyzed the case as an example of mass hysteria or suggestibility. The lack of controlled conditions and the presence of media interest are cited as key factors that compromised the integrity of the evidence.
Cautions and what is closed
The case illustrates the risks of accepting anecdotal evidence without rigorous scrutiny. It highlights how media sensationalism can amplify unverified claims. The involvement of children in such high-profile investigations raises ethical questions about their welfare and the potential for exploitation. The case serves as a cautionary tale about the boundaries between belief and verification.
Compare and confuse
The Enfield poltergeist is often compared to other famous cases of alleged hauntings, such as those investigated by Ed and Lorraine Warren. While some view it as a unique instance of poltergeist activity, others see it as part of a broader pattern of childhood deception and adult gullibility. It shares similarities with other historical cases where children were accused of causing supernatural disturbances.
Law and persecution
There were no legal proceedings directly related to the supernatural claims themselves. However, the case involved interactions with law enforcement when the mother first reported the disturbances. The subsequent media frenzy and public interest did not result in legislative changes but contributed to ongoing cultural conversations about the paranormal.
Questions people ask about Enfield poltergeist
What was the Enfield poltergeist?
It was a series of claims of supernatural activity at a London home from 1977 to 1979, involving moving objects and voices heard through two young sisters.
Who were the main people involved?
The events centered on sisters Janet and Margaret Hodgson. Paranormal investigators like Maurice Grosse and Guy Lyon Playfair studied the case, while skeptics like Joe Nickell questioned the findings.
Was the haunting proven to be real?
No definitive proof exists. Believers accepted the accounts as genuine paranormal activity, while skeptics concluded the events were likely hoaxes or tricks performed by the children.
How did the media cover the event?
The case received extensive press coverage, including tabloid articles and radio documentaries. It later inspired television series, plays, and major Hollywood films like The Conjuring 2.
What role did skeptics play?
Skeptics, including stage magicians and scientists, analyzed the evidence and found flaws in the recordings and photos. They argued that the children were fabricating the events for attention or entertainment.
Good reading and sources
- The Enfield ‘Poltergeist’: a sceptic speaksThe Guardian, Article
- BBC Radio 4BBC, Article
- Catherine Tate to star in Enfield poltergeist West End showBBC, Article
The facts on this page come from the Wikipedia article "Enfield poltergeist", written by its contributors and used under the CC BY-SA 4.0 licence, and from its Wikidata record (CC0). EveryJaadu rewrote the text in its own words, with AI assistance, and compares every page with the article to make sure no passage is copied. It may be reused under the same CC BY-SA 4.0 licence with a link back.
It may contain mistakes. Names and customs differ from one community to the next, and some knowledge is closed to outsiders and left out here. This page describes belief and practice. It does not say that any of it works, it is not a how-to, and it is not medical advice. If something is wrong, tell us. Last refreshed 2026-10-06.
More from the United Kingdom
All the entries from the United Kingdom
🇬🇧 United Kingdom and 2 moreKing ArthurBrenin Arthur
A legendary British king and folk hero of medieval literature and Welsh mythologyFigure · Power and authority · Wonder and entertainment Legendary
🇬🇧 United KingdomWitch trials in early modern Scotland
A period of judicial persecution where thousands were executed for alleged sorcery and diabolic pactsBelief · Cursing and harm Historical