News

Religion, magic and science

A long scholarly debate about whether magic, religion and science are separate kinds of thought or points on one line.

A book with a clasp: grimoires, papyri and manuals of rites, and the learned side of magic.

Also: the magic-religion debate, the Frazer-Malinowski debate, intellectualist and functionalist views

James Frazer, in The Golden Bough (1890), proposed a ladder: magic first, then religion, then science, each replacing the last. Bronislaw Malinowski, after fieldwork in the Trobriand Islands, argued that people use magic where outcomes are uncertain, such as deep-sea fishing, and use practical skill where they are not. Marcel Mauss and Henri Hubert treated magic as a social fact, shaped by group belief rather than individual error. E. E. Evans-Pritchard showed that Azande witchcraft belief explained misfortune in a logical way. Most anthropologists now doubt that the three can be cleanly separated, and many avoid the evolutionary ladder.

See also

Find entries that mention Religion, magic and science

The weekly digest

Every Monday: seven entries you may not know, what is on the calendar this week, and one rite drawn step by step.